US and China put 90-day pause on tariffs, effective duty on BESS falls to c.60%

LinkedIn
Twitter
Reddit
Facebook
Email

The US and China have announced a 90 day ‘pause’ on their huge reciprocal tariffs while they continue negotiations, with the effective tariff on BESS more than halving to around 60%.

In what was the two countries’ first joint statement on trade in years yesterday (12 May), the White House said they have agreed to lower their current tariffs for a 90 day period which expires on 1 July. Global stock markets and commodities jumped in response.

Specifically, the US will reduce its ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs announced on 2 April from 125% to 10% while China will reduce its retaliatory ones down to 10% too (those had prompted a retaliatory hike in the US’ tariffs, having initially been 34%).

What this means is a reduction in US tariffs on all Chinese goods from 145% to 30%. That 30% is made up of the two separate 10% tariffs announced prior to 2 April and the temporarily lower 10% Liberation Day tariff.

This article requires Premium SubscriptionBasic (FREE) Subscription

Try Premium for just $1

  • Full premium access for the first month at only $1
  • Converts to an annual rate after 30 days unless cancelled
  • Cancel anytime during the trial period

Premium Benefits

  • Expert industry analysis and interviews
  • Digital access to PV Tech Power journal
  • Exclusive event discounts

Or get the full Premium subscription right away

Or continue reading this article for free

That means an effective tariff on battery energy storage systems (BESS) or batteries for BESS of 40.9% right now and 58.4% from 1 January 2026, Energy-Storage.news calculates.

This is based on a pre-existing 3.4% tariff on all lithium-ion batteries globally plus a Section 301 tariff on batteries from China, currently 7.5% and set to increase to 25% in January 2026 for BESS, and already in place for EVs.

Clean Energy Associates’ senior policy analyst Christian Roselund meanwhile posted on LinkedIn that the effective tariff on BESS will be 65%. Energy-Storage.news has reached out to the company for comment on the news.

Roselund also cautioned that this week we may see the result of the AD/CVD petition by the American Active Anode Material Producers (AAAMP) calling for huge duties on active anode material from China, which would affect batteries and BESS.

Energy-Storage.news had been told that the 145% tariff meant that virtually no US BESS projects have been able to be finalised and financed since 2 April, so this reduction, even temporary, could unblock some of them. Some developers and owners may opt to wait out the 90 days to see what final agreement is made, while others may decide to push forward on the basis that tariffs will either increase or not change substantially.

3 November 2026
Málaga, Spain
Understanding technology and supplier selection for Europe’s utility-scale PV market in 2027. PV ModuleTech Europe 2026 is a two-day conference that tackles these challenges directly, with an agenda that addresses all aspects of PV module, inverter and battery supplier selection; product availability, technology offerings, supply chain traceability, quality assurance, factory auditing, system reliability, and supplier bankability.

Read Next

October 16, 2026
US energy storage developer Flatiron Energy has closed on approximately US$850 million for its 1,200MWh Energizar energy storage project in Chelsea, Massachusetts, US.
October 15, 2026
Energy storage owner-operator Nightpeak Energy has reached financial close and commercial operation on its 150MW/300MWh Bocanova 2 battery storage project in Brazoria County, Southeast Texas.
October 15, 2026
From the Midwest to New York, local and state governments are introducing new zoning rules and restrictions on BESS and data centre projects.
October 15, 2026
ASL has set a target of 1,500MW of new firming infrastructure in NSW by the end of May 2033 and opened a consultation on the tender.
October 14, 2026
The Illinois Power Agency (IPA) is seeking stakeholder feedback on its summer procurement of 600MW of energy storage projects in the US state, after falling short by 438MW.