PG&E’s latest big project proposals address need for four-hour capacity resources

Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on reddit
Reddit
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on email
Email
Image: PG&E.

California utility PG&E (Pacific Gas & Electric) is seeking approval for four large-scale battery energy storage projects it has selected from a competitive solicitation, including two systems which could be over 1GWh each.

Perhaps more significantly than their impressive sizing, the four projects each have a discharge duration of four hours and are being developed to address capacity deficiencies in two sub-areas – South Bay-Moss Landing and in Pease – and additionally to address issues related to voltage in another sub-area, Bogue.

On 29 June, PG&E filed a letter with the regulator, California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), seeking its approval for the projects, which the utility said were selected from more than 100 submitted options from around 30 competing proposals. Solicitations opened in January following an instruction to do so from CPUC and according to one of the applicants, Vistra Energy, a decision is expected within 90 days of the application being filed.

All four will be lithium-ion battery energy storage systems, with three at grid-scale, and one comprised of 10MW of connected behind-the-meter batteries at customer sites. The letter can be viewed here, including the table of projects below. At 300MW and four hours duration (1,200MWh) and 182.5MW/730MWh respectively, the Dynergy-Vistra projects and Tesla Powerpack project – which will be owned by the utility once completed – will be among the world’s largest grid-scale storage systems so far.  

The four projects which were selected from responses to PG&E’s Local Sub – Area Energy Storage Request for Offers. Image: PG&E.

The order from CPUC which went through to PG&E, Resolution E-4909, authorised the investor-owned utility (IOU) to “procure energy storage or preferred resources to address local deficiencies and ensure local reliability”. Shortly after that solicitation, California Energy Storage Alliance (CESA) chief Janice Lin commented to Energy-Storage.news that the CPUC move was vindication of energy storage’s effectiveness and affordability as a capacity resource.

While AB2514, the mandate given to PG&E and California’s other two main IOUs (SDG&E, SCE) for them to procure 1.35GW of energy storage was a couple of years ago hailed as a game changer in driving forward storage deployment in the state, other drivers have also begun contributing strongly, such as resiliency and backup, grid constraints and capacity requirements, assessed by network operator CAISO under Local Capacity Requirements and effectively pitting lithium batteries and other energy storage against gas peaker plants.  

Read Next

May 13, 2022
Renewable energy development company Ameresco has signed a non-exclusive purchasing framework with system integrator Powin Energy, totalling 2.5GWh of Powin’s Stack750 battery energy storage system (BESS) product until 2025.
May 12, 2022
Buyers of energy storage solutions (ESS) in Germany do not yet see a need for flow batteries for medium duration storage, an ESS provider tells Energy-Storage.news, with many set on the potential of green hydrogen.
May 11, 2022
Norwegian lithium-ion battery gigafactory group FREYR has signed a conditional offtake agreement with energy storage system integrator Powin Energy totalling 28.5GWh over six years.
May 10, 2022
New sodium-ion battery production facilities have been announced in the US and Sweden by Natron Energy and Altris, respectively, with both set to start production in 2023.
May 10, 2022
esla aims to reach annual deployments of energy storage totalling 1,500GWh by 2030, nearly four hundred times the amount it deployed last year, according to its 2021 recent impact report.

Most Popular

Email Newsletter