Maryland could cut energy costs and emissions with 2.5GW of storage by 2033, says ACP

LinkedIn
Twitter
Reddit
Facebook
Email

Some 2.5-3.6GW of energy storage could be cost-effectively deployed by 2033 to cut emissions and lower energy costs in the US state of Maryland, American Clean Power (ACP) said.

The renewable energy trade body’s study said that a rollout of 2.5-3.6GW of new energy storage would lead to net system cost savings to Maryland of approximately US$74-100 million in 2033.

That would be under an Increased Energy Storage scenario where no new gas is built and renewables account for 97% of electricity generation by 2033. The projected savings are compared to the Continued Gas Dependence scenario where new coal and gas resources come online and fossil fuel plants are 50% of generation.

CO2 emissions in 2033 under the Increased Energy Storage scenario would be 93% lower than 2023 while they would be just 23% lower under the Gas Dependence scenario. Energy costs to consumers would also be lower, but only by US$1 a month.

This article requires Premium SubscriptionBasic (FREE) Subscription

Try Premium for just $1

  • Full premium access for the first month at only $1
  • Converts to an annual rate after 30 days unless cancelled
  • Cancel anytime during the trial period

Premium Benefits

  • Expert industry analysis and interviews
  • Digital access to PV Tech Power journal
  • Exclusive event discounts

Or get the full Premium subscription right away

Or continue reading this article for free

The ‘Increased Energy Storage’ scenario entails an average annual deployment of 400MW a year of new energy storage, mostly in territories served by utilities Pepco and BGE.

A year ago the state of Maryland increased its economy-wide emissions reduction target from 40% to 61% by 2031, as reported by Energy-Storage.news. The announcement coincided with developer Convergent Energy + Power bringing three solar-plus-storage projects totalling 8MWh online, one of just a few large-scale projects seen in the state to-date.

While California and Texas continue to be by far the largest markets for energy storage in the US, other states are making high-level policy announcements to significantly ramp up their deployments too. Last month, Energy-Storage.news reported on state governments in Michigan and New Mexico proposing and setting (respectively) energy storage deployment targets for 2030 onwards.

Maryland is served by multi-state grid operator PJM.

The Maryland study, for which preliminary findings have been released with a fully report coming later, was commissioned by ACP and conducted by Synapse Energy Economics.

15 September 2026
San Diego, USA
You can expect to meet and network with all the key industry players again in 2025 from major US asset owners, operators, RTOs and ISOs, optimizers, software and analytics providers, technical consultancies, O&M technology providers and more.

Read Next

May 26, 2026
Gujarat Industries Power Co Ltd (GIPCL) is holding a competitive solicitation for a large-scale vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB) energy storage project in western India.
May 25, 2026
The US installed 9.7GWh of new battery energy storage system (BESS) capacity, according to the US trade association group, the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA).
May 22, 2026
Battery storage developer and operator Spearmint Energy has closed a US$450 million financing to support its 300MW/600MWh Red Egret battery energy storage system (BESS) project.
May 22, 2026
Long-duration energy storage (LDES) development and investment company Frontier Power USA (FPUSA) has acquired a 480MWh battery energy storage system (BESS) portfolio from developer-operator Bimergen Energy.
May 21, 2026
In this US news roundup, OCI Energy, MN8 Energy, GridStor, and Grenergy advance battery energy storage system (BESS) projects in Texas, California, Colorado, and Georgia.