Microvast denies China state links as DOE cancels US$200 million grant application

LinkedIn
Twitter
Reddit
Facebook
Email

The US Department of Energy (DOE) has cancelled a US$200 million grant application from lithium-ion battery firm Microvast, which rejected any links to the Chinese government.

The DOE decided this week to withdraw a previously announced intention of approving a US$200 million separator grant to Microvast, which designs, develops, and manufactures lithium-ion battery solutions. It did not provide specific reasons for the move. The decision was praised by Republican Senator John Barrasso, ranking member of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources (ENR), who commented:

This article requires Premium SubscriptionBasic (FREE) Subscription

Enjoy 12 months of exclusive analysis

  • Regular insight and analysis of the industry’s biggest developments
  • In-depth interviews with the industry’s leading figures
  • Annual digital subscription to the PV Tech Power journal
  • Discounts on Solar Media’s portfolio of events, in-person and virtual

Or continue reading this article for free

“The Department of Energy has finally retreated from sending U.S. taxpayer dollars to Microvast, an electric vehicle battery company with close ties to Communist China. I’m stunned it took the Biden Administration this long to admit the obvious: no company beholden to Communist China should be considered for U.S. government grants or loans. The administration should immediately reject other applicants with similar ties. It should also overhaul its grant making process and conduct due diligence before issuing press releases.”

Microvast chairman Yang Wu yesterday (24 May) responded, saying: “the company is surprised by the DOE’s decision to withdraw the grant, which was designed to help build a new facility in Kentucky that would employ hundreds of people.”

“Microvast is based in Texas, its shares are traded on Nasdaq, and the operations for our global business are centralized in the U.S. Neither the Chinese government nor the Chinese Communist Party has any ownership in the company, nor do they control or influence company operations in any way. The company is therefore considering all of its options.”

Read the full statement from Microvast here and a fact sheet summarising its main rebuttal points here.

The company manufactures lithium-ion battery cells through plants in Texas, Germany and China and full BESS systems since launching a specialist battery division last year, shortly before announcing its first order for 1,200MWh for an undisclosed customer.

Read Next

July 17, 2025
Tom Sisto, CEO of US flow battery provider XL Batteries, writes that lithium-ion batteries’ dependence on a supply chain controlled almost completely by one country is a risk that could be avoided.
July 16, 2025
London Stock Exchange-listed Gore Street Energy Storage Fund (GSF) has entered into an agreement to sell its investment tax credits (ITCs) for the Big Rock energy storage project in California, US.
Premium
July 16, 2025
Peak Energy president and CCO Cameron Dales speaks with Energy-Storage.news about the state of the battery storage industry after the signing of the Budget Reconciliation Act into law.
July 15, 2025
Invinity Energy Systems believes partnering with a Chinese materials and manufacturing company will enable significant cost reduction of its vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB) technology.
July 14, 2025
Two companies, First Phosphate and LG Energy Solution have recently begun manufacturing lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery cells in North America.

Most Popular

Email Newsletter