Arguing that energy storage is “critical to ensuring a resilient, reliable, cost-effective and sustainable grid”, the Energy Storage Association joined with 52 other organisations to plead the place of storage in the Trump’s administration’s infrastructure priorities.
Penning a letter to Congress, the coalition of energy storage advocates asserted that any dialogue on enhancing and rebuilding infrastructure and modernising the grid must involve energy storage systems. Signing the letter alongside ESA's leadership were companies and groups including Johnson Controls, Lockheed Martin, 24m Technologies, AES Energy Storage, LG Chem, Enel Green Power North America, Green Charge, Greensmith, National Electrical Contractors Association, Panasonic, Parker Hannifin, Siemens, Stem, Sunverge, UL and several others.
Enjoy 12 months of exclusive analysis
- Regular insight and analysis of the industry’s biggest developments
- In-depth interviews with the industry’s leading figures
- Annual digital subscription to the PV Tech Power journal
- Discounts on Solar Media’s portfolio of events, in-person and virtual
Or continue reading this article for free
“If you want to talk about grid resiliency, energy storage is part of that conversation. If you want to talk about load modulation, demand response, storage is a part of that conversation,” Matt Roberts, executive director of ESA, told Energy-Storage.News back in February, noting the significant opportunity for storage in the federal government’s expressed priorities.
As well as enhancing grid reliability, energy storage provides an additional cost-saving benefit, with system costs plummeting 30% over last year. “Energy storage systems are also fuel neutral and help any generation resources connected to the grid – whether fossil or renewable – become more efficient, productive, and competitive,” the letter reads.
The letter went on to argue the strong position in the storage market that the nation holds; with more than 50,000 domestic jobs in the industry and with commercial deployment of storage systems growing more than 100% over the previous year.
However, despite the evident business case for including energy storage as an innovate part of US energy infrastructure; there is still inadequate public policy in place to spur the growth of this emerging industry. Therefore, by beseeching Congress, the ESA and its co-signatories sought to highlight the ways in which the federal government could assist states in pursuing the necessary research, manufacturing, integration and development of storage systems.
The letter depicted this assistance as coming in many forms; including reducing interconnection and permitting barrier and incentivising early deployments. At the state level, New York, Texas, Utah and Arizona are among the states whose utilities have innovated to advance storage in grid balancing and frequency regulation capacities through pilot deployments.
However, with support from the federal level, the US could be suitably equipped to not only meet its grid modernisation and infrastructure goals, but will remain a leader in the storage market and encourage additional job growth and electricity savings.
The full letter to Congress can be read here.