The Energy Storage Report 2024

Now available to download, covering deployments, technology, policy and finance in the energy storage market

Capacity market de-rating in UK nudges Anesco towards flow batteries

UK battery energy storage. Image: Anesco.

UK energy storage and solar project developer Anesco is investigating how it could adopt flow batteries into future projects instead of lithium as a response to growing uncertainty around the future of storage de-rating in the capacity market, our sister site Clean Energy News revealed this morning.

The country's government Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) published a consultation in July outlining proposals to alter the current de-rating status of storage assets participating in the market to reflect discharge periods achievable by the batteries.

This article requires Premium SubscriptionBasic (FREE) Subscription

Enjoy 12 months of exclusive analysis

  • Regular insight and analysis of the industry’s biggest developments
  • In-depth interviews with the industry’s leading figures
  • Annual digital subscription to the PV Tech Power journal
  • Discounts on Solar Media’s portfolio of events, in-person and virtual

Or continue reading this article for free

This would lower the rate from its current 96% to various levels depending of the assets‘ ‘energy limited storage’, which in the consultation varied between 30 minutes – assumed to be the usual capability of batteries currently in the capacity market – and four hours, to address the potential length of a stress event in the UK.

As a result the business case around shorter duration batteries, which are often currently used to bid into the market, will likely be impacted.

Speaking at the Solar & Storage Live show earlier this month, Anesco’s director of connections Daniel Cohen explained that the potential for this regulatory change has meant that the developer is now seeking out battery technologies with longer discharge duration potential. Anesco has been one of the most proactive of Britain's solar developers in moving into energy storage, retrofitting 10 UK solar farms with 12MWh of batteries in April.

The company then received notice in September that it could retain accreditation for financial support under the government's Renewables Obligation (RO) scheme for three 5MW solar farms after retrofitting energy storage. It made another significant UK industry first later that month when it unveiled Britain's first subsidy-free solar farm, with energy storage a key component of the business model under which the facility will earn revenues.

“We're not just looking at lithium batteries which we use at the moment; we're looking at flow batteries because of [the] capacity market. It's all about how we're going to cope with de-rating so we're looking at batteries that can last longer than lithium to cope with that mechanism and contract,” he said.

He later clarified to Clean Energy News that the company was visiting sites in the UK to further understand the technical ability of flow batteries and how Anesco could adapt the product.

“We are evaluating everything from two to 10 hours for different applications; this is very much in the development stage at present,” he added.

Uncertainty still reigns over de-rating rules

BEIS has yet to clarify when the de-rating changes could be applied, with concern among some storage developers that it could be brought in soon and affect the upcoming capacity market auctions in January and February 2018, despite pre-qualification windows having already closed.

Describing Anesco’s preparations for the upcoming auctions, Cohen said: “We spent 18-24 months building a portfolio to go into [the] capacity market and suddenly we get a nudge in the back about de-rating.

“It is worrying, hence we're looking at flow batteries and other technologies. You have to stay flexible and nimble, and work with the decisions that have been made.”

However, he added that initial investigations into flow battery technology had found that the sheer size of the units needed for Anesco’s purposes make development difficult from a planning perspective.

Despite these issues, the company will continue to look at using flow batteries in future should they be needed to suit the capacity market, while also investigating technology being developed for longer duration lithium batteries.

Email Newsletter