How other states can replicate California and Texas’ storage successes

Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on reddit
Reddit
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on email
Email

There is still plenty of educating decision-makers on storage’s place on the grid to do for other US states to follow in the footsteps of early-movers like California and Texas, and it goes beyond overcoming technical challenges.

That was the message from speakers on the ‘Evolving Grid’ panel discussion at Berkeley Lab’s virtual National Energy Storage Summit yesterday (9 March).

Kelly Sarber, CEO of consultancy Strategic Management Group & Board Member for storage association NY-BEST, started by explaining how California and Texas’ grids had achieved their GW-plus levels of storage deployment.

“It’s because those markets value the revenue stacks that developers can benefit from like resource adequacy, voltage or frequency support, backup peak power etc as well as being able to upgrade the transmission without necessarily investing in that transmission using very well-placed energy storage,” she said.

Energy storage experts have a big role to play in educating states’ decision-makers about storage’s place on the grid, she said. That would then allow them to replicate the early-movers ways of incentivising investment in the sector.

Haresh Kamath, Director of Energy Storage and DER Integration at research organisation Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) echoed this, saying: “We really have to make sure that the decision-makers are educated about the potential here to try to understand how energy storage fits in, not just from a technical standpoint, but also from a business and regulatory standpoint.”

Something all panellists touched on was the breadth of stakeholders that will be involved in the deployment and integration of energy storage into the grid at scale, and the challenges that involves.

Julia Souder, Executive Director of the Long Duration Energy Storage Association of California, highlighted one specific way of maximising the results of discussions between those different stakeholders:

“I think what also needs to happen is there needs to be a lot more funding from government and other sources to help improve the technical capacity of stakeholders, so that when we are discussing benefit cost ratio, or risks, or modelling, it’s a level playing field.”

There is also a need to get long-duration storage projects in the ground at full-scale by 2026 meaning they need to be kicked off in the next 12-15 months, said Ben Bollinger, Vice President for Strategic Initiatives at Malta Inc, a electro-thermal energy storage system technology provider.

But as well as new technologies and deployments, leveraging existing capacity in clever ways can also increase the amount of storage on the grid.

Christian Belady, Vice President and Distinguished Engineer at Microsoft said that the company has gigawatts of energy storage which provides backup power for servers and hence mostly sits idle. Microsoft is looking at ways it can participate those assets in the grid ancillary services market, he said.

Read Next

June 29, 2022
The German parliament has passed law amendments giving energy storage its own legal definition, in a move welcomed by industry sources.
June 29, 2022
Australia’s Clean Energy Council calls for an energy storage target, while arguing that a plans for a capacity mechanism should be scrapped.
June 28, 2022
Energy storage can enhance the reliability and lower the costs of operating and maintaining Ontario’s electricity distribution network.
June 27, 2022
To integrate a targeted 500GW of non-fossil fuel energy onto India’s networks by 2030, at least 160GWh of energy storage will be needed.
June 27, 2022
Investor-owned utility SDG&E and the City of San Diego are launching a dozen microgrid projects with energy storage across San Diego, California, following similar announcements elsewhere in the state.

Most Popular

Email Newsletter