Effective battery storage fire safety involves going beyond standards

By Angus Moodie, engineering manager UK & Northern Europe, Enertis Applus+
LinkedIn
Twitter
Reddit
Facebook
Email
Figure 1. Global grid-scale BESS deployment and failure statistics – sourced from the EPRI BESS Failure Incident Database and Wood Mackenzie data.

Fire safety should always be the BESS industry’s top priority and there are effective steps to achieve it, writes Angus Moodie, engineering manager at consultancy Enertis Applus+.

Fire incidents involving battery energy storage systems (BESS), although they are of relatively very low occurrence, easily capture the attention of the public and authorities as this is a relatively new technology and because the failure produces dramatic images and potential lasting effects to neighbours, first responders, and the local environment.

Although failure incidents are decreasing (as shown in Figure 1 above), each incident gives an opportunity for investigations to be carried out and for the industry and authorities to learn a little more about how to improve the safety of these systems.

However, relying mostly on the learning gathered after incidents occur is a lagging method and inherently standards have been behind the deployment of the technology, which evolves at a much rapid pace. While it is true that standards and legislation should be taken as baseline for the design, construction, operation, and dismantling of BESS systems, we should not stop there.

This article requires Premium SubscriptionBasic (FREE) Subscription

Enjoy 12 months of exclusive analysis

Not ready to commit yet?
  • Regular insight and analysis of the industry’s biggest developments
  • In-depth interviews with the industry’s leading figures
  • Annual digital subscription to the PV Tech Power journal
  • Discounts on Solar Media’s portfolio of events, in-person and virtual

Or continue reading this article for free

Implementing a comprehensive risk management hierarchy that takes into consideration all relevant variables is a best practice that is essential to ensure the safety of BESS installations. An analysis of what happened at the Moss Landing Energy Storage Facility in California in January, together with a comparison of current standards and methods, can illustrate this point.

Elimination strategy

Elimination means removing potential fire hazards from the design and operation of BESS installations. Project developers and owners should ask themselves a crucial question: is it absolutely necessary to introduce a storage technology that will present a fire hazard?

In some cases, BESS project may only be viable with the properties of lithium-ion storage systems, and it must be recognised that this decision introduces the fire hazard to your project. If another technology was selected, the steps discussed below would require to be adjusted according to the technology selected, to the point of even being avoided entirely or, at least, reduced significantly.

Substitution strategy

Substitution involves using safer materials and technologies when designing battery cell composition to minimise fire risks. Lithium iron phosphate (LFP) has a lower risk of thermal runway compared to nickel manganese cobalt (NMC). Even if the cells used in a given project are tested to the established standards, compliance with those standards does not fully eliminate the possibility of fire incidents.

Engineering controls

Engineering controls involve the implementation of systems to control fire hazards, such as physical barriers and fire suppression. This is where most of the effort to minimise the likelihood and severity of any fire incident is placed, once the two areas described above have been defined.

Battery manufacturers are responsible for implementing the battery management system (BMS) to manage the state of the cells to keep them healthy, protect them and detect abnormal situations. The cooling systems will keep the cells in their safe operating conditions.

If a thermal runaway occurs, then their cell and module design, as well as fire detection and suppression systems, will reduce the impact of the fire, and gas detection and ventilation systems can act to prevent explosion events.

Nowadays, BESS cabinets and containers limit the spread of fire for at least one hour. The containers for the BESS modules allow for the containment and build up of concentrations of gases or smoke particles so that a fire detection and suppression system can function correctly.

These features are mandated in standards internationally and the level of fire and gas detection, suppression or ventilation, as well as the control decisions around operation of the site in these conditions, are key considerations in any design.

The next level of engineering controls is protecting the BESS from outside influence introducing faults that result in thermal runaway. In particular, the electrical protection of the system is key to avoid electrical system faults influencing the BESS. Appropriate care when selecting the right protection scheme and devices is pivotal to reducing the risk to the project.

The next area of review is the site layout, which plays a key role in managing the severity of fire consequences. While standards provide prescriptive guidelines for site layout implementation, the risks that are being addressed are not always explicitly stated in the documentation.

Main risk areas associated with this type of projects are:

  • Constrained access to BESS equipment and areas of the site blocked by fire or other objects;
  • Access to BESS equipment through the smoke path of the fire;
  • Fire spreading from one unit to another, and/or the wider environment.

Some suggested solutions in standards and guidelines include:

  • Provide multiple access points to the site;
  • All roads should be suitable for fire-service vehicles and their turning circles;
  • Access paths should be wide enough and with turning circles for multiple fire-service vehicles to be operating around the site at the same time;
  • Passing places on access paths for fire-service vehicles;
  • Orientate the access points away from prevailing wind direction;
  • Inclusion of break points between rows of batteries to allow vehicles or personnel to pass through and limit the spread of fire;
  • Minimum distances to other BESS/buildings/vegetation or other flammable materials or sources of fire, and the use of fire rated barriers when these distances cannot be met.

Manufacturers are now conducting large-scale fire testing (LSFT) as outlined in standards such as CSA TS-800. These tests help assess the likelihood and severity of fire events and they can be presented to authorities when discussing fire safety measures and site layout decisions. This testing evidence is crucial for fire risk assessment and management strategy, informing both the engineering controls and the administrative controls.

Administrative controls

Administrative controls are the policies and procedures established to manage fire risks effectively. This level of risk management is there to manage the residual risk once all the above measures have been implemented. These controls should be informed by the design and the residual risk left for the future user of the BESS installation.

It is often best to complete these administrative controls in consultation with your local fire authorities as well as the operations and maintenance services provider at the earliest possible stage of the project. They will provide feedback on these controls and the design that would further reduce the risk to their personnel and make the response actions more robust.

If the steps above are followed diligently to address the fire safety risks beyond the baseline given in standards and legislation, these potential cases will be even rarer than they are today. It may seem like an extra cost or effort that is not worth it, but it could just keep a fire incident small, preventing it from becoming a severe incident.

About the Author

Angus Moodie, is engineering manager for the UK & Northern Europe at Enertis Applus+, a provider of technical consulting, engineering and quality control services in the renewable energy and energy storage sector. Moodie has experience in product and system design, including energy storage systems and power systems and is a chartered member of the Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET). 

  

7 October 2025
Asia
By 2026, the Asia-Pacific region is forecast to contribute 68% of the projected $10.84 billion market. Over the past decade, Asia has fortified its grids with batteries that enable smart grids, renewable integration, responsive electricity markets, and ancillary services. In this rapidly evolving landscape, Energy Storage Summit Asia is your guide to this burgeoning market. Now in its second year, the Summit gathers independent generators, policymakers, banks, funds, offtakers, and cutting-edge technology providers and clarifies what successful energy storage procurement and deployment strategies look like. Topics covered include macro-level policy, supply chain dynamics, financing strategies, co-location considerations, safety measures, microgrid insights and more.
14 October 2025
InterContinental, Santiago, Chile
We are excited to bring the industry together for the fourth edition of the Energy Storage Summit Latin America on 14-15 October in Santiago, Chile. The Summit has become a meeting place for IPPs and developers, investors, financiers and banks, utilities, consultancies, software providers, and manufacturers who are setting high standards in the Latin American energy storage sector.
14 October 2025
10am PDT / 6pm BST
Join Wärtsilä battery analytics experts Andrea Meister and Steve Merrick for a critical session that cuts through the confusion surrounding state of charge (SoC), state of health (SoH), cell imbalance, and round-trip efficiency (RTE)—parameters that directly impact real-time operations and revenue. As grid demands intensify and performance expectations rise, the margin for error is shrinking. Andrea and Steve will unpack how these metrics are measured, how errors and degradation develop, and how to proactively avoid them. You’ll gain practical insights into how these factors influence real-time usable energy and system performance.
14 October 2025
Brussels, Belgium
can be added on the Energy Storage News event page. The Energy Storage Global Conference 2025 takes place form 14-16 October and will bring together representatives from across Europe to discuss the evolving landscape of energy storage. The programme will focus on policy, market dynamics and regional developments, while also addressing key issues such as legislative challenges, safety guidelines and decarbonisation strategies. Participants will gain insights into financing and market opportunities, as well as the unique advancements and integration efforts taking place within the Benelux region. For more information on the conference, please visit: https://www.accelevents.com/e/ENERGY-STORAGE-GLOBAL-CONFERENCE-2025?aff=EnergyStorageNews
14 October 2025
The Marble Arch Hotel, London, UK
As developers and investors expand into new markets and more projects approach commissioning, this Summit provides the platform to address the key challenges of battery asset management head-on. In 2025, the programme will centre around three essential themes: Revenue & Trading, the Lifecycle of the Battery, and Optimisation Tools for Success. With deep dives into core markets—including the Nordics, Iberia, Italy, Germany, the UK & Ireland, and the Benelux region—you’ll gain the insight needed to position yourself as a leader in battery asset performance and strategy.
21 October 2025
360 Madison Avenue, New York
Returning for its 12th edition, Solar and Storage Finance USA Summit remains the annual event where decision-makers at the forefront of solar and storage projects across the United States and capital converge. Featuring the most active solar and storage transactors, join us for a packed two-days of deal-making, learning and networking.

Read Next

Most Popular

Email Newsletter