Battery storage failure incident rate dropped 97% between 2018 and 2023

LinkedIn
Twitter
Reddit
Facebook
Email

Battery storage failure incidents have dramatically decreased in frequency in the last few years, but the industry still needs to be more transparent and share data when incidents occur.

That’s a key takeaway from a new joint study published yesterday (15 May) by the US Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) and data analytics provider TWAICE.

Claimed as the first publicly available analysis of battery energy storage system (BESS) failures, the work is largely based on EPRI’s BESS Failure Incident Database and looks at the root causes of a number of events inputted to it.

The authors said the report is an attempt to help mitigate issues and concerns around BESS performance and safety, identifying gaps that need to be addressed.

This article requires Premium SubscriptionBasic (FREE) Subscription

Enjoy 12 months of exclusive analysis

Not ready to commit yet?
  • Regular insight and analysis of the industry’s biggest developments
  • In-depth interviews with the industry’s leading figures
  • Annual digital subscription to the PV Tech Power journal
  • Discounts on Solar Media’s portfolio of events, in-person and virtual

Or continue reading this article for free

The rate of failure incidents fell 97% between 2018 and 2023, with a chart in the study showing that it went from around 9.2 failures per GW of battery energy storage systems (BESS) deployed in 2018 to around 0.2 in 2023.

But when failures have occurred there is often a lack of transparency around root causes leading to a lack of understanding on how to deal with them as an industry.

For instance, while the safety of lithium batteries is often called into question in the wake of fires or explosions, the report found that 65% of incidents could be linked to operation and integration of batteries, and just 11% were caused by failures of battery cells or modules.

However, no public resource exists that categorises failure events by their cause, while in the US, there are no requirements anywhere at federal, state or local jurisdiction level for incident reporting. There are often even legal barriers that prevent details of detailed root cause analysis from being made public even where they have been carried out.

The report did note however that for events logged prior to 2017, any sort of root cause indication was rare, and was less so the case after 2018. The industry matured around the 2017-2018 timeframe, when annual BESS deployments worldwide surpassed a gigawatt for the first time, marking the “advent of the commercial BESS industry,” as the report put it.

Reluctance from battery OEMs and integrators keeps transparency limited, and the authors found that out of 81 incidents on the database, sufficient information to assign a root cause was made public for just 26 of them.

Classifying failure events by their causes would enable better understanding of how they occur, which components are most often the cause, and further the knowledge of both technical and non-technical stakeholders, the authors argued.

The report gave five possible categories of root cause: design, manufacturing, integration, (including assembly and construction) and operation. Three separate categories of system element meanwhile can be identified in each case: cells/modules, controls and balance of system (BOS).

Among elements, BOS failures, which can include power conversion system (PCS), thermal management and other non-battery hardware, were the most common cause along with controls. Among root causes, it is in integration, assembly and construction where the majority of failures originate.

New projects are the most likely to experience a failure, with 72% of incidents occurring during construction, commissioning or within the first two years of operation.

The full report can be downloaded from the EPRI website.

2 December 2025
NH Collection Vittorio Veneto, Rome, Italy
Across two packed days, the Summit focused on three core themes: revenue & trading, the lifecycle of the battery, and optimisation tools. Attendees explored innovative strategies for enhancing asset performance and longevity, with a spotlight on key markets like Germany, Italy, and the UK. Stay tuned for details on the 2025 edition of the Battery Asset Management Summit Europe, where we’ll continue to chart the path forward for energy storage asset management.

Read Next

September 16, 2025
A proprietary explosion control system performed effectively in three recent safety tests conducted on Wärtsilä battery storage equipment.
Premium
September 12, 2025
The Town of Ulster in New York has received a request from local officials of the neighbouring town of Hurley to temporarily suspend the permitting process of a 250MW/1,000MWh BESS project under development by independent power producer (IPP) Terra-Gen. 
September 3, 2025
During the morning of 30 August 2025, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) responded to a possible vegetation fire in the area of independent power producer (IPP) Arevon Energy’s California Flats solar-plus-storage project.
September 3, 2025
Andrew Early and Ben Echeverria of EPC Burns & McDonnell continue their list of tips for navigating the choppy waters of battery storage project delivery.
Premium
September 2, 2025
East Point Energy has been dealt a blow in its pursuit to construct a 150MW/600MWh BESS in Maryland.

Most Popular

Email Newsletter